Support of render passes (or channels as they are called in Vray for Revit).This enhances the renders and breaks up the horizontal lines of the buildings to provide a more organic look and feel of the renders. Yes, blades of grass through the Vray Fur tool. HDRI support to create nicer lighting setups for our renders.Here is a list of some of the extra features that make the renders look a lot nicer: Vray for Revit has more features than Revit’s default render engine, which makes it a lot more powerful and a better option for rendering. ![]() ![]() This is quite good, since it speeds up the process by allowing us to stay in the same tab all the time and get our renders finished. Also, you can launch a render from that same Tab. On that tab, you can configure the resolution, the quality, the lights, the materials, the exposure and even the settings of the render. To start off, all the tools of Vray for Revit are available in a special tab on the Ribbon in Revit. Note: If you’d like to know more about the difference between AutoCAD and Revit visit this post HERE These renders looked, by far, better than the default Revit renders, and we hadn’t even gotten to any of the advanced options or any of the rest of the tools. Using a few of the tools in the Vray tab and with a few extra clicks on some of the settings, we were able to produce professional looking renders in a matter of minutes. In fact, a lot easier than Vray for Maya or for 3D Max, where we need to configure down to the tiniest detail to get a professional-looking render. To our surprise, Vray for Revit proved to be quite simple to use. In any case, we decided to give it a try and see what happened. Third party renderers offer a lot more flexibility and options and the final renders require (in some cases) a lot less post-production work, which makes them better options for rendering our projects.Ī few months ago, we had the chance to use Vray for Revit, and even though we were quite familiar with the way Vray works in other programs, like Maya and 3D Max, we read that things were a little bit different in Revit, so we were a little concerned that this could slow down our workflow and our production schedule. The renderings produced by Revit, even without these features, certainly look great, but they need a good amount of work in a post-production program like Photoshop or After Effects to take them to the next level. Revit’s default rendering engine, even though it is quite easy to use/setup, has a few drawbacks, like the lack of HDRI support, the absence of a tool/system to create grass (which is quite used in architectural renderings), the lack of rendering passes to composite/enhance the render in an external imaging program or the ability to render on multiple computers to speed up the process, to name a few. ![]() To render a project in Revit, we can use either Revit’s default render engine or use a third-party render engine (plug-in). Rendering in any program (like Revit or 3D Max and using either the program’s default render engine or plugins like Vray) is a skill that most architects/designers/students/3D enthusiasts want to develop to be able to translate their design ideas into an image, this way, clients can understand more precisely what the project will look like and will allow them to make more informed decisions about it. Vray for Revit: What is so Good About it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |